Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report presents a novel skin paddle technique for covering lower-limb injuries, offering flexibility amid complex trauma.
Background: The latissimus dorsi free flap is a workhorse for extensive lower-extremity soft tissue defects. Conventionally, the skin paddle is designed according to the anticipated defect and left in place on the muscle as a single composite unit. This report describes an alternative approach in which the skin paddle is secondarily mobilized through subcutaneous undermining and rotated as a separate propeller-type local extension flap on random-pattern vascularization, without a specifically identified perforator—a technique that has not been previously reported. Case Presentation: A 38-year-old male with a high-energy distal lower-extremity defect exposing bone, Achilles tendon, and hardware underwent free latissimus dorsi reconstruction with an empirically designed skin paddle over the constant perforator zone. The skin paddle was subsequently mobilized and rotated as a separate propeller-type extension flap to cover the Achilles region, with additional areas managed using split-thickness skin graft and a reverse soleus flap. Results: The latissimus dorsi flap and skin paddle remained viable, providing stable coverage of the defect. The additional reverse soleus flap achieved durable medial coverage, and the limb was ultimately preserved with satisfactory soft-tissue stability. Conclusion: A random-pattern latissimus dorsi skin paddle designed within the anatomically constant perforator zone can provide a feasible new option offering intraoperative flexibility in complex lower-extremity trauma when perforator mapping is impractical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budimir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: