Case series demonstrates safe defect reconstruction using a hybrid-enveloped abdominal flap in forearm injury patients, indicating reduced donor-site morbidity without vascular compromise.
BACKGROUND: Extensive upper extremity soft-tissue defects with exposed vital structures present a significant reconstructive challenge, particularly when microsurgical options are unavailable. Traditional distant pedicled abdominal flaps require a wide skin tube to protect the vascular pedicle, resulting in substantial donor-site morbidity and risks of pedicle compression. This study introduces a modified technique utilizing a hybrid combination of artificial dermis and local skin flap to create a hybrid-enveloped pedicle, aiming to minimize donor-site sacrifice and improve postoperative management. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2025, 5 patients with extensive proximal or mid-forearm defects underwent reconstruction using a paraumbilical perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap. The vascular pedicle was protected using a conduit constructed from a combination of a small skin flap and artificial dermis, forming a flexible tube. A retrospective review assessed flap survival, complications, donor-site outcomes, and functional recovery. RESULTS: All 5 flaps survived. The length of the pedicle segment enclosed by the hybrid envelope ranged from 4 to 7 cm. No pedicle compression, infection, or vascular crisis occurred. One patient developed distal flap-tip necrosis, which healed with conservative management. All flaps demonstrated satisfactory contour, texture, and integration with surrounding tissues. Upper-extremity joint motion recovered well in all cases, and all patients reported high satisfaction with the reconstructive outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The artificial dermis-assisted hybrid pedicle technique offers a safe, reliable, and tissue-sparing alternative to the conventional skin-tube method for distant abdominal flap transfer. It effectively reduces donor-site morbidity, minimizes compression risk, enhances postoperative monitoring, and facilitates earlier rehabilitation. This refined approach represents a practical and accessible reconstructive solution for complex upper extremity defects in settings where free tissue transfer is contraindicated or unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: