Analysis highlights the shift towards open education, emphasizing democratic engagement over technical obstacles.
This paper analyses the current conjuncture of digital education across three levels: (1) a landscape shaped by the confluence of right-wing authoritarianism and Big Tech ideology; (2) a regime shaped by proprietary platforms and vendor lock-in; and (3) a niche of open-source and OER communities working to build democratic alternatives. I argue that the transition towards Open Education as a Digital Public Good is not primarily a technical challenge but foremost a democratic one, requiring landscape critique, infrastructural policy, and institutional recognition of care work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markus Deimann (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: