Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper focuses attention on the concept of accuracy in regional input-output tables. Two interpretations of accuracy, namely partitive and holistic accuracy, are discussed with reference to interpretation of input-output tables. Implications are drawn from recent contributions to the regional input-output literature in terms of the `reconciliation' debate and the survey versus non-survey debate. Holistic accuracy is the only concept which is tenable in practice; some suggested criteria for holistic accuracy are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. C. Jensen (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: