PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Comparative effectiveness of doublet versus triplet therapy in high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A real-world evidence study.

View Full Paper
OSOlesia StativkoИПИ. А. ПокатаевARAlexey Rumyantsev

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of doublet versus triplet therapy in high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
  • Multicenter retrospective study of patients with high-volume mHSPC from 2022 to 2024.
  • Patients were matched using cardinality matching at a 2:1 ratio.
  • Primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival, and secondary endpoint was overall survival.
  • Triplet therapy had a 2-year PFS of 75.9% compared to 48.9% for doublet therapy (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.80).
  • 2-year OS was 82.9% for triplet therapy vs. 66.8% for doublet (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.79).
  • Significant benefits were seen in patients under 65 years, with liver metastases, Gleason score ≥8, and detectable baseline erythroblasts.

Abstract

e17084 Background: Although the combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the established standard of care for patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the added benefit of intensifying therapy with docetaxel to create a triplet regimen remains undefined. In the absence of direct comparative randomized trial data, real-world evidence (RWE) is crucial to inform this treatment intensification decision. Methods: Our multicenter retrospective study included patients with high-volume mHSPC (by CHAARTED criteria) who initiated doublet (ADT + ARPI) or triplet (docetaxel + ADT + ARPI) therapy between 2022 and 2024. To mitigate confounding, patients were matched using cardinality matching at a 2:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points was overall survival (OS). PFS was defined as the time from treatment initiation to clinical/radiological progression, commencement of subsequent systemic therapy, or death from any cause. Results: Of 183 patients 122 received triplet (ADT+docetaxel+abiraterone or ADT+docetaxel+enzalutamide), 61 doublet therapy (ADT+enzalutamide or apalutamide). The triplet regimen demonstrated superior outcomes: 2-year PFS was 75.9% vs. 48.9% (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.80) and 2-year OS was 82.9% vs. 66.8% (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.79). The benefit of docetaxel addition was pronounced in patients aged 65 years or with metachronous high-volume disease. Conclusions: Real-world data confirms the superiority of triplet therapy for the majority of patients with synchronous high-volume mHSPC. Treatment intensification can be effectively guided by routine clinical characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stativko et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a80de0307b78509432c29https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e17084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper