Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved climbing stability in wall-climbing robots, suggesting enhanced functionality for industrial applications.
Purpose This paper addresses two key limitations of heavy-duty tracked wall-climbing robots using negative-pressure adhesion: suction-cup “lip curling,” which induces air leakage on contact, and the difficulty of steering in confined vertical spaces. Design/methodology/approach An integrated mechanical design is proposed, featuring a liftable suction module to prevent premature edge contact and a static lift-and-rotation mechanism for zero-radius steering. A static stability model is developed to derive the vacuum-pressure safety threshold (η = 3). A 50 kg full-scale prototype is built and tested on a vertical wooden panel, which provides a conservative baseline for anti-slip verification due to its lower friction coefficient than rough concrete. Findings The liftable mechanism suppresses suction-cup lip curling and maintains sealing integrity. A full-scale 50 kg prototype achieved stable vertical climbing at an average speed of approximately 20 mm/s and performed repeatable static on-the-spot steering with a mean rotation angle of about 11° per cycle under payloads up to 10 kg. During operation, the vacuum pressure generally remained at or below the theoretical safety threshold of −63.4 kPa (gauge); brief transients observed during steering-module handover did not cause slip or loss of adhesion. Originality/value The proposed liftable adhesion and static steering concept offers a practical structural solution for heavy-duty wall-climbing robots. The structure–model–experiment framework and prototype provide a useful reference for inspection and maintenance of large-scale infrastructure such as wind-turbine blades and cement facades.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
景恒心 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: