Why the study?
The manufacturing process for alteplase was recently modified to meet increasing global demands, requiring evaluation to establish bioequivalence with the current manufacturing process.
Does alteplase from a modified manufacturing process demonstrate bioequivalence to the current formulation in healthy male volunteers?
Does alteplase from a modified manufacturing process demonstrate bioequivalence to the current formulation in healthy male volunteers?
A modified manufacturing process for alteplase produces a bioequivalent formulation to the current process, supporting its use to meet global demands.
Modified alteplase manufacturing yields a bioequivalent formulation; supports clinical use to meet supply needs and confirms pharmacokinetic equivalence.
OBJECTIVE: . The current manufacturing process for alteplase was recently modified to meet increasing global demands. The aim of this randomized, open-label, adaptive two-stage design, two-way crossover study was to establish bioequivalence of alteplase derived from the two manufacturing processes (modified versus current). METHODS: The two alteplase formulations (modified and current, 0.2 mg/kg body weight) were compared in healthy male volunteers after intravenous infusion over a period of 30 min. The trial was put on hold after treatment of 12 subjects (Part A) and restarted as Part B (n = 18) with design adaptations, including a heparin bolus. RESULTS: ) for alteplase after single intravenous infusion demonstrated no differences between alteplase obtained from the modified and current processes. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was applied to test for bioequivalence. The geometric means ratio and the respective 92.83% confidence intervals (CIs) for all primary and secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints were well within the prespecified equivalence boundaries of 80-125%. The CIs also included unity, suggesting no statistically significant differences between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that alteplase exposure was virtually identical for the formulations tested, and statistical evaluation demonstrated bioequivalence of the formulations. Both formulations of alteplase were well tolerated by the subjects at the single intravenous doses in the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT04419493, 2019-004932-40 (EudraCT Number).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glund et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: