Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved protection settings in transmission networks, suggesting enhanced reliability.
With the expansion of transmission networks and the increasing penetration of inverter-based resources (IBRs), fixed offline distance-protection settings face increasing difficulty in balancing selectivity, sensitivity, and operating speed. This problem is particularly evident in Zone III remote-backup protection, where conservative load-avoidance settings may create blind zones. This paper proposes an adaptive three-zone distance-protection setting method based on explicit sensitivity constraints and a disturbance-domain model. The method has two main features. First, online recalculation is restricted to the local disturbance domain affected by topology changes, thereby avoiding network-wide recomputation. Second, Zone II and Zone III settings are determined by a constrained model that incorporates real-time branch coefficients, load impedance, sensitivity requirements, and downstream coordination limits. A fallback mechanism is also included to maintain security under data loss or abnormal measurements. In a 220 kV case study, the proposed method increases the Zone II sensitivity coefficient from 1.92 to 1.95 and the Zone III remote-backup sensitivity coefficient from 0.83 to 1.35. Additional tests under high-resistance faults, measurement errors, volatile load, and inverter-based resource integration show that the method preserves selectivity while reducing backup protection blind zones. The disturbance-domain strategy also reduces the average recalculation time from 820 ms to 18 ms in the tested regional setting-calculation scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: