Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial shows improved survival in locally advanced head and neck cancer with checkpoint inhibitors, highlighting their safety and efficacy.
e18074 Background: Multiple phase III trials have evaluated the addition of perioperative or adjuvant/postoperative PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to curative-intent multimodality therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), yielding heterogeneous results across treatment strategies. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in LA-HNSCC. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through January 2026 for randomized controlled trials in LA-HNSCC comparing standard curative-intent multimodality therapy with perioperative (neoadjuvant ± adjuvant) or adjuvant/postoperative PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (including maintenance after definitive therapy) versus standard therapy alone; trials evaluating concurrent PD-1/PD-L1 blockade during definitive chemoradiation were excluded. The primary outcome was time-to-event efficacy, pooling event-free survival and disease-free survival as hazard ratios (HRs). Secondary outcomes included treatment-related serious adverse events and treatment-related deaths (grade 5 events). Results: Three phase III randomized trials were included (n=1,786). Pooled analysis demonstrated improved event-free/disease-free survival with checkpoint inhibition: HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.91, I²=0%). Treatment-related serious adverse events were more frequent in the checkpoint inhibitors group RR 1.79 (95% CI 1.43-2.24, I²=0%). Rates of treatment-related deaths (grade 5 events) were similar between the two groups, RR 1.90 (95% CI 0.50-7.14, I²=0). Conclusions: The addition of perioperative or adjuvant/postoperative PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to curative-intent multimodality therapy in LA-HNSCC was associated with a significant improvement in event-free/disease-free survival. Safety was characterized by higher rates of treatment-related serious adverse events, with no meaningful increase in treatment-related deaths. These findings support immune checkpoint inhibition as an effective adjunct to curative-intent multimodality treatment strategies in LA-HNSCC. Data summary table with event counts for each outcome. Trial EFS/DFS (events) (ICI vs Control) Serious treatment-related AEs(ICI vs Control) Treatment-related deaths(ICI vs Control) KEYNOTE-689 136/363 vs 159/351 69/361 vs 33/315 4/361 vs 1/315 NIVOPOST-OP (GORTEC 2018-01) 112/332 vs 140/334 104/312 vs 59/306 2/312 vs 2/306 IMvoke010 89/203 vs 92/203 7/202 vs 1/203 1/202 vs 0/203 Total 337/898 vs 391/888 180/875 vs 93/824 7/875 vs 3/824
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: