Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines recovery performance in Chinese manufacturing firms, suggesting governance quality influences outcomes.
This study examined how corporate governance relates to the recovery of Chinese listed manufacturing firms after exiting special treatment (ST). Using a sample of 182 A-share manufacturing firms that recovered between 2009 and 2023 and remained out of ST for at least three consecutive years, the study treated recovery as multidimensional: profitability restoration (ROA, ROE), financial resilience (ZChina score), and market confidence (Tobin's Q). A two-step system GMM dynamic panel model with year effects was used to control for performance persistence and endogeneity. Results showed that overall governance quality (G score) had a significant positive correlation with profitability restoration and financial resilience, indicating that better governance helps stabilise and improve recovery after ST exit. However, market confidence showed a different pattern: G score had a significant negative correlation with Tobin's Q, whereas the share of female directors and political connections had significant positive correlations with Tobin's Q. Overall, recovery is not a single-track process. These findings provide guidance for policymakers, board members, and investors when gauging governance quality and assessing sustainable recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Accounting Research Institute (ARI) UiTM (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: