Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates effects of new REMS on etonogestrel implant in reproductive healthcare, suggesting access may decline.
In 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration introduced a new Risk Evaluation and Management Strategy (REMS) for the etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Although the intent was to maintain safe practices for device insertion and removal, the large body of long-standing safety data should raise questions about the need for these new requirements. In the absence of safety concerns regarding device insertion and removal, a REMS requirement on the etonogestrel contraceptive implant may lead to decreased reproductive health care access and provision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: