Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study evaluates survival outcomes in stage IV melanoma patients, suggesting the efficacy of immunotherapy.
e21511 Background: Latin American melanoma data reflect distinct epidemiology and variable treatment access. REMMEC is a Colombian registry; survival estimates in stage IV disease remain limited. Methods: To characterize baseline features and first-line treatments and to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a Colombian metastatic melanoma cohort, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage IV melanoma in REMMEC (January 2011–June 2025) across multiple centers. Eligibility: histologically confirmed cutaneous or mucosal melanoma, distant metastases, age ≥18 years. Index date: stage IV diagnosis. OS was time from index to death; PFS was time from index to progression (RECIST v1.1 or investigator assessment) or death. Kaplan–Meier methods with log-rank tests compared groups. Cox models adjusted for age, sex, ECOG status, BRAF status, number of metastatic sites, and lactate dehydrogenase (reference: chemotherapy/other). Two-sided P<0.05 was significant. Multiple imputation for missing covariate data. Results: Mean age was 64 years (SD, 16); 55% male; 61% low-income. At initial presentation, 80% had stage IV disease. Primary site: cutaneous 70%, mucosal 30%; most common subtype was acral lentiginous melanoma (23%). BRAF testing was performed in 221 patients (61%), with mutations in 20% of those tested. First-line: immunotherapy monotherapy (n=161, 44%), dual-agent immunotherapy (n=54, 15%), BRAF/MEK inhibitors (n=22, 6%), chemotherapy/other (n=127, 35%). Adverse events 34% (any grade, CTCAE v5.0). Objective response 18.6% (complete 8.5%, partial 10.1%; RECIST v1.1). Median follow-up 29 months. Median OS 24 months (95% CI, 20–35); median PFS 21 months (95% CI, 18–26). Cutaneous melanoma: OS/PFS 32/25 months (95% CI, 24–58/20–32); mucosal melanoma: OS/PFS 19/17 months (95% CI, 13–NR/12–26; NR=not reached). By treatment—OS: immunotherapy 40 months (32–NR), BRAF/MEK 29 months (13–NR), chemotherapy/other 14 months (6–55); PFS: immunotherapy 32 months (25–40), BRAF/MEK 26 months (13–NR), chemotherapy/other 12 months (6–32). PFS events 167. Adjusted models showed improved OS and PFS with immunotherapy (OS HR 0.27 [95% CI, 0.15–0.49], P=0.001; PFS HR 0.35 [0.20–0.61], P=0.001). BRAF/MEK inhibitors were associated with longer OS (HR 0.43 [0.20–0.90], P=0.025) but not PFS (HR 1.36 [0.38–4.89], P=0.64; estimate imprecise due to small n). Metastatic burden ≥3 sites predicted shorter OS and PFS (OS HR 2.31 [1.30–4.11], P=0.004; PFS HR 2.21 [1.30–3.77], P=0.003). Conclusions: Immunotherapy was the predominant first-line approach and was associated with longer OS and PFS versus chemotherapy/other after adjustment. High stage IV and acral lentiginous prevalence support earlier detection strategies and expanded access to immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: