Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative trial evaluates automated grading of diabetic retinopathy using deep learning architectures, indicating effective screening methods.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-age adults globally, affecting an estimated 93 million people worldwide, with India bearing the second-largest absolute burden due to its 77-million-strong diabetic population. Early-stage DR is asymptomatic, making systematic screening of the diabetic population essential for timely intervention. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of four deep learning architectures — a custom 7-layer CNN, VGG-16, ResNet-50, and EfficientNet-B0 — for automated five-class DR grading (No DR, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Proliferative DR) on a 10,000-image fundus dataset curated from three district hospital ophthalmology units in Lucknow and Raipur. Transfer learning with ImageNet pre-training, class-weighted focal loss to address the 8:1 class imbalance between No DR and Proliferative DR, and extensive data augmentation (rotation, horizontal flip, CLAHE contrast enhancement) were applied uniformly across architectures for fair comparison. ResNet-50 achieved the highest test accuracy of 96.8% and macro-averaged F1-score of 95.9%, with AUC of 0.97 on the ROC curve. EfficientNet-B0 showed competitive performance (accuracy 95.4%) with 40% fewer parameters. A confusion matrix analysis reveals that the most clinically significant misclassification — Severe DR predicted as Moderate (false negative rate 8.1%) — warrants human-in-the-loop verification for grades 2–3. The study demonstrates the feasibility of automated DR screening deployment on hospital-grade computing infrastructure in resource-limited settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ananya Singh, Vikram Rao Desai, Neeraj Tiwari (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: