Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares selective index lymph node resection with therapeutic dissection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma patients, suggesting potential for improved outcomes.
TPS9609 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a standard therapy for resectable stage III melanoma, with randomized trials demonstrating superior outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy alone. The phase 2 SWOG-1801 trial showed 72% EFS at 2 yrs for NAT & 49% for adjuvant PEMBRO (P=0.004), while the phase 3 NADINA trial confirmed superiority of NAT IPI/NIVO over adjuvant NIVO (2-year RFS 83.7% vs 57.2%, HR 0.32). Pathological response, particularly major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor), strongly correlates with improved outcomes, with the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC) pooled analysis (N=610 ICI patients) demonstrating 3-yr RFS of 93% for MPR patients (pts) vs 41% for those with no pathological response. The PRADO trial demonstrated that selective index lymph node (ILN) resection (RES) can safely de-escalate surgery in MPR pts, with only 4/60 (6.7%) MPR pts recurring after median follow-up of 28.1 months, all locoregionally. ILN RES significantly reduced surgical morbidity & improved quality of life compared to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND). However, PRADO was a single-arm proof-of-concept study. An international survey of 117 melanoma experts showed 71% believe a phase 3 randomized controlled trial is needed to change practice. The MSLT-3 trial will definitively establish whether ILN RES is non-inferior to standard TLND for MPR pts. Methods: This phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial will enroll approximately 1,574 pts with resectable stage IIIB-D cutaneous melanoma to identify 496 with MPR following NAT. Eligible pts must have cytologically/histologically confirmed resectable stage IIIB-D melanoma with at least one macroscopic lymph node in groin, axilla or neck basins. All pts are randomized 1:1 to ILN RES or TLND, stratified by continent/region, AJCC stage, & NAT regimen. Prior to NAT, all pts undergo radiological placement of a marker in the largest metastatic lymph node. Pts receive NAT per institutional standard of care (minimum one PD-(L)-1 checkpoint inhibitor, maximum 6 weeks duration) followed by surgery at weeks 6-9 according to randomized arm. Pathological response is assessed per INMC criteria. Pts with MPR in the ILN arm undergo surveillance only; non-MPR pts in the ILN arm proceed to TLND within 3 weeks. Primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival in MPR pts (non-inferiority margin -5%). Secondary endpoints include escalation to TLND for isolated nodal recurrence, salvage therapy rates, distant metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, overall survival, surgery-related AEs, quality of life (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L, FACT-M), concordance of imaging/ctDNA with pathology & health economics. Clinical trial information: NCT07049276 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: