Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective trial compares overall survival and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, indicating significant toxicity concerns.
e20058 Background: Large-scale clinical data directly comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (ConvRT) in the sequential setting for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 4-week HypoRT regimen is as effective and safe as a 6-week ConvRT regimen. Methods: Large-scale clinical data directly comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (ConvRT) in the sequential setting for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 4-week HypoRT regimen is as effective and safe as a 6-week ConvRT regimen. Results: From October 2018 to December 2024, 280 patients were included and allocated in a 2:1 ratio to the HypoRT group (n = 178) or the ConvRT group (n = 102). Baseline characteristics were balanced. With a median follow-up of 47.2 months, HypoRT did not meet the pre-specified non-inferiority margin for OS compared to ConvRT. Median OS was 51.4 months in the HypoRT group and 44.6 months in the ConvRT group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–1.36). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 90.3%, 72.8%, 58.4%, and 46.5% for HypoRT, and 89.1%, 71.2%, 57.4%, and 45.8% for ConvRT, respectively. Median PFS was similar between groups (19.5 vs. 16.2 months; HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.35; p = 0.68). Regarding safety, the HypoRT group had a significantly higher incidence of grade ≥2 radiation esophagitis (67.6% vs. 22.5%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis (16.5% vs. 18.7%; p > 0.05), grade ≥3 acute hematological toxicity (59.8% vs. 66.5%; p > 0.05), or long-term toxicity profiles. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, the 4-week HypoRT regimen (60 Gy/20 F) did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority in OS compared to the 6.5-week ConvRT regimen (66 Gy/33 F) for stage III unresectable NSCLC treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy. While survival outcomes were numerically similar, HypoRT was associated with a significantly increased risk of grade ≥2 esophagitis. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and toxicity management when considering hypofractionated schedules in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: