Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved mitochondrial function in neuronal tissue, indicating new therapeutic approaches to ischemic brain injury.
Aims: Cerebral ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury is a leading cause of neurological disability and is characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Although depletion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ) is a hallmark of ischemic injury, therapeutic strategies aimed at NAD + replenishment have shown limited efficacy. Whether impaired mitochondrial NAD + import contributes to neuronal vulnerability after I/R remains poorly understood. Results: We found that cerebral I/R disrupts the balance of NAD + distribution between the cytoplasm and mitochondria in the cortex due to upregulated expression of SLC25A51. Augmenting SLC25A51 expression restored mitochondrial NAD + pools, improved mitochondrial respiratory function, reduced oxidative lipid damage, and attenuated neuronal injury. In contrast, SLC25A51 deficiency exacerbated mitochondrial dysfunction and heightened susceptibility to I/R stress. These effects occurred independently of global NAD + biosynthesis, indicating that mitochondrial NAD + transport rather than NAD + availability per se is a critical determinant of neuronal survival. Innovation: This study reveals the subcellular distribution change of NAD + -mediated by SLC25A51 and its neuroprotective effects via modulating mitochondrial function after cerebral I/R injury. Conclusion: This study identifies defective mitochondrial NAD + import as a previously underrecognized mechanism of cerebral I/R injury. By establishing SLC25A51-dependent NAD + trafficking as a key regulator of mitochondrial redox balance and neuronal resilience, our findings shift the therapeutic paradigm from NAD + supplementation to restoration of subcellular NAD + distribution, highlighting mitochondrial NAD + transport as a promising target for ischemic brain injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 00, 000–000.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: