Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study evaluates procalcitonin/albumin ratio in predicting mortality after TAVI, suggesting its clinical value.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as preferred treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. Inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers have been increasingly investigated for their prognostic value. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the procalcitonin/albumin ratio (PAR) in predicting 1-year mortality after TAVI. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent TAVI between June 2020 and January 2024. Pre-procedural serum procalcitonin and albumin levels were measured, and the PAR was calculated. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality and hospitalization for heart failure were defined as primary outcomes. Results: A total of 210 patients were included in the study. PAR was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the PAR had a moderate-to-good discriminatory ability for predicting 1-year mortality (area under the curve = 0.784 [95% confidence interval: 0.709-0.858]). In multivariate analysis, PAR was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the PAR, as a combined marker of inflammation and nutritional status, may serve as a useful prognostic indicator in patients undergoing TAVI. The association between a higher PAR and increased mortality risk highlights the potential role of systemic inflammation and malnutrition in post-TAVI outcomes. The pre-procedural PAR appears to be a promising biomarker for predicting 1-year mortality after TAVI. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and explore potential clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pamuk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: