Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we propose an omnibus test for comparing two survival functions under non-proportional hazards. The test statistic is based on a product-limit estimate of the restricted distance correlation, which is closely related to the <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>L</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:math> {L}₂ distance between survival curves. The strong consistency is established under mild regularity conditions. Our simulation studies show that the new test has satisfactory power under proportional hazard and various non-proportional hazards settings including delayed treatment effect, diminishing effect, and crossing survival curves; therefore, it can be a competitive alternative to the existing omnibus tests such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Cramer-von Mises test, two-stage test, and the maxCombo test based on weighted log-rank statistics. Two extensions of the new test to one-sided alternatives and a Gaussian kernel are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qingyang Zhang (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: