PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1997Clinical Chemistry320 citationsOpen Access

Improved troponin T ELISA specific for cardiac troponin T isoform: assay development and analytical and clinical validation

View Full Paper
MMMargit Müller-BardorffKHKlaus HallermayerASAngelika Schröder

Structured PICO

Does the second-generation cardiac troponin T ELISA (TnT 2) improve specificity for myocardial damage compared to the first-generation assay?

P
Population
Test samples from 43 marathon runners, 24 patients with rhabdomyolysis, 40 patients with renal failure, 20 muscular dystrophy patients, 4955 patients without myocardial damage, and 323 samples from AMI-suspected patients
I
Intervention
Second-generation cardiac troponin T ELISA (TnT 2)
C
Comparator
First-generation troponin T ELISA (TnT 1)
O
Outcome
Assay cross-reactivity, detection limit, imprecision, and correlation with first-generation assaysurrogate

The second-generation cardiac troponin T ELISA eliminates false-positive results from skeletal muscle injury, providing a highly specific assay for myocardial damage.

Abstract

The first generation of troponin T ELISA (TnT 1) can yield false-positive results in patients with severe skeletal muscle injury. Therefore, a cardiac-specific second-generation troponin T ELISA (TnT 2) was developed, in which the cross-reactive antibody 1B10 has been replaced by a high-affinity cardiac-specific antibody M11.7. No cross-reactivity of TnT 2 was observed with purified skeletal muscle troponin T (1000 micrograms/L) or in test samples from 43 marathon runners and 24 patients with rhabdomyolysis and highly increased creatine kinase. TnT 2 was increased > 0.2 microgram/L in 5 of 40 patients with renal failure and in 4 of 20 muscular dystrophy patients. The detection limit is 0.012 microgram/L. Day-to-day imprecision (CV) within the range 0.19-14.89 micrograms/L was < 5.8%. In 4955 patients without myocardial damage, 99.6% had TnT < 0.10 microgram/L. Assay comparison (TnT 1 vs TnT 2) over the whole concentration range (i.e., in 323 samples from AMI-suspected patients) showed a slope, intercept, and standard error of estimate (Sey) of 1.18, 0.01 micrograms/L, and 0.81 microgram/L, respectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Müller-Bardorff et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a89257ff99bba0645d3a5https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.3.458
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper