Key result
The second generation cTnT whole blood rapid assay demonstrated 76-94% concordance with quantitative ELISA and a 2.5-fold lower analytical cut-off than the original assay.
Why the study?
Does a second generation whole blood rapid assay for cTnT improve analytical sensitivity and concordance with quantitative ELISA compared to the original rapid assay in patients with suspected cardiac conditions?
Observational (n=445)
Yes
Does a second generation whole blood rapid assay for cTnT improve analytical sensitivity and concordance with quantitative ELISA compared to the original rapid assay in patients with suspected cardiac conditions?
The second generation cTnT whole blood rapid assay demonstrates high concordance with quantitative ELISA and a 2.5-fold lower analytical cut-off, potentially improving rapid triage of cardiac patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports further assessment of second-generation cTnT rapid assays; should not yet change practice pending prospective studies.
We evaluated a second generation, qualitative, whole blood rapid assay for cardiac troponin T (cTnT), which employs a more cardio-specific troponin T mouse monoclonal capture antibody. Using quantitative cTnT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results as the benchmark for accuracy, we compared the performance of the second generation and the original whole blood rapid assays in 445 samples from patients with the following diagnoses, determined by medical record review: myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, ischaemic heart disease, musculoskeletal disease, renal failure or other noncardiac conditions. Overall, concordance between the second generation cTnT Rapid Assay and the quantitative cTnT ELISA, compared using the McNemar test and a cut-off concentration of 0.1 microgram/L, was in the range 76-94% for each patient group. Using a receiver operating characteristic plot, the cut-off for the second generation cTnT Rapid Assay was in the range 0.06-0.08 microgram/L. We conclude that the second generation cTnT whole blood assay has a 2.5-fold lower analytical cut-off than the original rapid assay (0.2 microgram/L) and may represent a more sensitive clinical tool for the rapid triage and risk stratification of cardiac patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azzazy et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Cardiac and noncardiac conditions (n=445). Second generation whole blood rapid assay for cardiac troponin T vs. Quantitative cTnT ELISA and original whole blood rapid assay was evaluated on Concordance with quantitative cTnT ELISA. The second generation cTnT whole blood rapid assay demonstrated 76-94% concordance with quantitative ELISA and a 2.5-fold lower analytical cut-off than the original assay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: