Why the study?
What are the appropriate cardiac stress testing modalities for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease in elderly patients?
What are the appropriate cardiac stress testing modalities for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease in elderly patients?
Cardiac stress testing, tailored to the patient's exercise capacity, remains a crucial tool for the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease in the elderly.
Guides modality selection by exercise capacity in elderly CAD evaluation; leaves open need for prospective validation in modern cohorts.
The elderly constitute an increasing percentage of patients evaluated and treated for coronary artery disease. Clinical and noninvasive evaluation are important in both the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary disease in the elderly, and stress testing is an important part of that evaluation. For older individuals capable of vigorous treadmill or cycle exercise, the exercise electrocardiogram, either alone or combined with radionuclide or echocardiographic imaging, remains an excellent diagnostic and prognostic tool. For the large percentage of elderly patients unable to perform adequate exercise, pharmacologic stress testing with dipyridamole, adenosine, or dobutamine is a valuable alternative. The clinician's challenge is to choose the most appropriate cardiac stress test for his or her patient from among the many alternatives available. Future studies comparing the accuracy and cost-to-benefit ratio of various stress tests with regard to the elderly will help achieve this goal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulman et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: