Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this article is to contrast responsible with irresponsible inclusion practices for students with learning disabilities. Guidelines for responsible inclusion are that the student and family are considered first, teachers choose to participate in inclusion classrooms, adequate resources are provided for inclusion classrooms, models are developed and implemented at the school-based level, a continuum of services is maintained, the service delivery model is evaluated continuously, and ongoing professional development is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaughn et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: