Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Among all adaptive filtering algorithms, Widrow and Hoff's least mean square (LMS) has probably become the most popular because of its robustness, good tracking properties and simplicity. A drawback of LMS is that the step size implies a compromise between speed of convergence and final misadjustment. To combine different speed LMS filters serves to alleviate this compromise, as it was demonstrated by our studies on a two filter combination that we call combination of LMS filters (CLMS). Here, we extend this scheme in two directions. First, we propose a generalization to combine multiple LMS filters with different steps that provides the combination with better tracking capabilities. Second, we use a different mixing parameter for each weight of the filter in order to make independent their adaption speeds. Some simulation examples in plant identification and noise cancellation applications show the validity of the new schemes when compared to the CLMS filter and to other previous variable step approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arenas‐García et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: