Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper looks at the incentives of individual members of a monetary policy committee to gain a reputation for inflationary toughness. I show a policy maker can have more or less incentive to build a reputation when part of a group. But, group policy making leads to higher expected social welfare. Not publishing individuals’ votes, raises the temptation to inflate and lowers expected social welfare. If the culture or rules of a central bank puts more weight on senior policy makers, the incentive to build a reputation is greater, but expected social welfare may be higher or lower.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anne Sibert (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: