Why the study?
Does adherence to standardized administration of anti-platelet drugs reduce primary end-point events in patients newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease?
Does adherence to standardized administration of anti-platelet drugs reduce primary end-point events in patients newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adherence to standardized anti-platelet therapy significantly reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease.
The aim of the present study was to explore the effect of adherence to standardized administration of anti-platelet drugs on the prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease. A total of 144 patients newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease at Lu'an Shili Hospital of Anhui Province (Lu'an, China) between June 2010 and June 2012 were followed up. Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox regression model were used to evaluate the effects of standardized administration of anti-platelet drugs on primary and secondary end-point events. Of the patients with coronary heart disease, 109 (76%) patients took standard anti-platelet drugs following discharge. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analysis showed that standardized administration of anti-platelet drugs reduced the risk of primary end-point events (including all-cause mortality, non-lethal myocardial infarction and stroke) of patients with coronary heart disease [hazard ratio (HR)=0.307; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.099-0.953; P=0.041) and all-cause mortality (HR=0.162; 95% CI: 0.029-0.890; P=0.036); however, standardized administration had no predictive value with regard to secondary end-point events. Standardized administration of anti-platelet drugs obviously reduced the risk of primary end-point events in patients with coronary heart disease, and further analysis showed that only all-cause mortality exhibited a statistically significant reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: