Why the study?
Does aortic valve replacement reduce QT dispersion and left ventricular mass index in men with symptomatic aortic stenosis?
Does aortic valve replacement reduce QT dispersion and left ventricular mass index in men with symptomatic aortic stenosis?
Aortic valve replacement significantly reduces QT dispersion and left ventricular mass index in men with symptomatic aortic stenosis, suggesting QT dispersion could be a useful indicator of risk reduction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AVR-associated QT dispersion reduction in symptomatic AS warrants interpretive caution; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether QT dispersion is a reliable index of the severity of aortic stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy in the setting of aortic stenosis. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the results of echocardiography and electrocardiography before and after aortic valve replacement. SETTING: Tertiary centre. PATIENTS: 36 men (30 white and six black) with symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring valve replacement. RESULTS: All patients had significant aortic stenosis (mean (SD) aortic valve area 0.68 (0.18) cm2) and evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index (LVMI): 267 (90) g/m2). Before aortic valve replacement, QT dispersion was correlated with mean aortic valve area and LVMI (r = 0.697, p < 0.001, and r = 0.59, p < 2.4 x 10(-6), respectively). QT dispersion and QT corrected for heart rate dispersion decreased from 133 (54) to 71 (33) ms and from 151 (64) to 94 (76) ms, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). LVMI regressed after aortic valve replacement to 190 (79) g/m2, p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: QT dispersion is increased in association with LVMI in patients with significant symptomatic aortic stenosis. Aortic valve replacement reduces QT dispersion and LVMI. QT dispersion could be a useful indicator of risk and risk reduction in patients with significant symptomatic aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darbar et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: