Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We are concerned here with establishing the consistency and asymptotic normality for the maximum likelihood estimator of a “merit vector” (u₀,,uₜ), representing the merits of $t +1$ teams (players, treatments, objects), under the Bradley–Terry model, as t → ∞. This situation contrasts with the well-known Neyman–Scott problem under which the number of parameters grows with t (the amount of sampling), and for which the maximum likelihood estimator fails even to attain consistency. A key feature of our proof is the use of an effective approximation to the inverse of the Fisher information matrix. Specifically, under the Bradley–Terry model, when teams i and j with respective merits uᵢ and uⱼ play each other, the probability that team i prevails is assumed to be uᵢ/(uᵢ + uⱼ). Suppose each pair of teams play each other exactly n times for some fixed n. The objective is to estimate the merits, uᵢ’s, based on the outcomes of the $nt(t +1)/2$ games. Clearly, the model depends on the uᵢ’s only through their ratios. Under some condition on the growth rate of the largest ratio uᵢ/uⱼ (0 ≤ i, j ≤ t) as t → ∞, the maximum likelihood estimator of (u₁/u₀,,uₜ/u₀) is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. Some simulation results are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simons et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: