Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the relationship between age, histological type, and size of ovarian tumors. METHOD: A review was made of 1648 cases of histopathologically diagnosed ovarian tumors and tumor-like lesions, and information on the age of the patients and size of the tumor was obtained. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: There were 840 (51%) cases of benign tumors, 73 (4%) cases of tumors of low malignant potential (LMP), 268 (16%) cases of malignant tumors and 467 (28%) cases of tumor-like lesions. The age of the patients was significantly different among tumor-like lesions (34.6+/-8.1 years), benign tumors (39.8+/-16.4 years), LMP tumors (45.2+/-18.3 years) and malignant tumors (51.9+/-13.0 years) (P<0.0001). The maximum diameter of the tumors was significantly different among tumor-like lesions (7.1+/-3.3 cm), benign tumors (10.9+/-5.6 cm), malignant tumors (13.6+/-6.5 cm) and LMP tumors (18.5+/-6.8 cm) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The distribution of tumor histological type (tumor-like lesions, benign, LMP and malignant) was correlated against patient age and lesion diameter, with tumors in older patients or larger tumors more likely to be malignant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okugawa et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: