Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The usual system design compromise in high resolution satellites is to have a higher spatial resolution panchromatic (PAN) channel with 3 or 4 lower spatial resolution multispectral (MX) channels and generate a high spatial & spectral resolution prod- uct on ground by making use of the fusion techniques. Since the telescopes of such systems are designed to cater to modulation transfer function (MTF) requirements of higher resolution PAN channel, the MX channels generally have high MTF value at their Nyquist frequency and hence the data is aliased. Also, the general design in such systems is to keep along track separation between MX detectors in the focal plane which results in these channels seeing the same target on ground one after the other with time separation. Due to this design choice, multiple factors such as relative change in satellite attitude, effect occurring by differing look angles and elevation of the terrain, and misalignment occurring due to slight rotation that can occur between detectors placements of these channels. contribute to sub-pixel shifts between MX channels during inorbit imaging. This paper proposes an approach to increase the resolution of MX channels without using any high resolution auxiliary channel, by exploiting high MTF present in the MX channels and misregistration arising due to imaging time separation. A new prior which can be used to adap- tively preserve edges and reduce noise simultaneously, a method which increases the robustness in point spread function (PSF) estimation from stellar have also been proposed. Experiments show that the resolution of MX can be improved from 1.6m to 1m without using any PAN band for ISRO’s Cartosat-2E i.e. self-superresolution. Our method is generic and can be applied to data from any satellite. The method is especially useful for increasing the resolution of satellites which have only multi- spectral channels without a higher resolution panchromatic channel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2024) studied this question.