Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Historical DVT review contextualizes objective diagnostics; leaves open integration with contemporary noninvasive validation.
Credit for fundamental studies leading to our current understanding of deep-vein thrombosis should be given to Bauer, who used phlebography to diagnose deep-vein thrombosis complicating fractures of the tibia,1 and to Sevitt and Gallagher for their autopsy-based studies of the prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with other injuries2,3. The development of objective methods for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis has facilitated the investigation of its natural history and has provided a rational basis for its prevention and treatment.DiagnosisMost venous thrombi are clinically silent when they are first detectable by objective methods,2,4 probably because they . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinmann et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: