PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2003Health Education Research100 citationsOpen Access

The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?

View Full Paper
DLDavid T. Levy

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Our objective was to review the research on the effects of public clean air laws on smoking rates, compare these effects to those found in studies on the impact of private worksite restrictions and derive estimates of the potential reductions in smoking rates that might be expected from the implementation of the two types of policies. Data sources were computerized databases, references identied from pertinent peer-reviewed journal articles and books, and suggestions by experts on tobacco control policy. Comprehensive public clean air laws have the potential to reduce prevalence and consumption rates of the entire population (including non-working and non-indoor working smokers) by about 10%. Studies on private worksite regulations also suggest that strong worksite restrictions have the potential to reduce the prevalence rate of the entire population by about 6% over the long-term and the quantity smoked by continuing smokers by 2 8%, depending on the length of time after the ban. Further research is needed on the effects of the different types of public clean air policies on the entire smoking population and on different sociodemographic groups, how the effects of public clean indoor air laws depend on private restrictions already in place, and how the effect of private restrictions depend on whether or not they are supported by public clean air laws. Recent attention has centered on getting clean indoor laws passed as part of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999; Department of Health and Human Services, 2000). Smoking may be restricted at worksites, restaurants and other public places, such as grocery stores,

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David T. Levy (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1aa51ba020f538e6857b0ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyf045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Changes in Employee Smoking Behavior After Implementation of Restrictive Smoking Policies1996 · 26 citations
  2. 2Promoting Smoking Cessation at the Workplace1993 · 46 citations
  3. 3State and Local Legislative Action To Reduce Tobacco Use2000 · 18 citations
  4. 4Tobacco Taxes, Smoking Restrictions, and Tobacco Use1998 · 39 citations
  5. 5Effects of a city ordinance regulating smoking in restaurants and retail stores1993 · 20 citations