Why the study?
Existing real-time ECG systems typically detect abnormalities using simple rules rather than advanced classification methods.
Does a real-time mobile-based ECG system using an SVM classifier accurately detect and classify cardiac arrhythmias?
Does a real-time mobile-based ECG system using an SVM classifier accurately detect and classify cardiac arrhythmias?
A novel mobile-based ECG monitoring system utilizing an SVM classifier was developed and tested for real-time remote arrhythmia detection.
Preliminary testing on limited data does not support clinical adoption; leaves open real-world performance of SVM-based mobile ECG systems.
In this study, we propose an electrocardiogram (ECG) system for the simultaneous and remote monitoring of multiple heart patients. It consists of three main components: patient, sever, and monitoring units. The patient unit uses a wearable miniature sensor that continuously measures ECG signals and sends them to a smart mobile phone via a Bluetooth connection. In the mobile device, the ECG signals can be stored, displayed on screen, and automatically transmitted to a distant server unit over the internet; the server stores ECG data from several patients. Health care stakeholders use a monitoring unit to retrieve the ECG signals of multiple patients at any time from the server for display and real-time automatic analysis. The analysis includes segmentation of the ECG signal into separate heartbeats followed by arrhythmia detection and classification. When compared to existing real-time ECG systems, where the detection of abnormalities is usually performed using simple rules, the proposed system implements a real-time classification module that is based on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Extensive experimental results on ECG data obtained from a TechPatient TM simulator, a real person, and 20 records from the MIT arrhythmia database are reported and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: