Key result
Living in a high ICU use region increased the risk of ICU admission by 63% (RR 1.63) for patients with a moderate risk of death compared to a low ICU use region.
Why the study?
Does geographic region influence the likelihood of ICU admission for elderly patients with varying risks of death?
Cohort (n=15,047,516)
Yes
Does geographic region influence the likelihood of ICU admission for elderly patients with varying risks of death?
Geographic variation in ICU admission rates is heavily driven by patients with low to moderate risks of death, indicating that efficiency efforts should not focus exclusively on end-of-life care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional ICU variation may reflect inefficiency for moderate-risk patients; hypothesis-generating for efficiency targets beyond end-of-life care.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colin R. Cooke (2016) conducted a cohort in Common medical and surgical diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia) (n=15,047,516). High regional ICU use (Quartile 4) vs. Low regional ICU use (Quartile 1) was evaluated on Risk of ICU admission for patients with moderate (quartile 2) risk of death in high versus low ICU use regions (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.53-1.72, p=<0.001). Living in a high ICU use region increased the risk of ICU admission by 63% (RR 1.63) for patients with a moderate risk of death compared to a low ICU use region.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: