Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study reveals second-order expectations drive social influence during expectation conflicts, indicating that beliefs about others' perceptions outweigh self-expectations.
Two types of expectations are proposed to guide social interaction: those one holds for herself (first‐order expectations) and those one believes others hold for her (second‐order expectations). Also, interaction is assumed to be guided by three motives: contributing to group performance, preserving status, and facilitating interaction. These points are developed by formally incorporating ideas regarding reflected self‐appraisals, dramaturgical accounts of the interaction order, and expectancy‐value theory into status characteristics theory. When first‐ and second‐order expectations conflict and an actor's motives are equally weighted, it is suggested that second‐order expectations guide interaction. An initial experiment provides empirical support and insight for discussion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Troyer et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: