Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the consistence of an ecosystem framework within the cultural sector and investigate the potential role of intellectual capital (IC) in cultural ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents the results of an empirical research carried out within a specific Italian area, the Po Delta. It was based on sound theoretical analysis and group interviews focusing on three main discussion topics. Findings – The research validated the consistence of ecosystem frameworks in relation to the cultural sector and the key role played by IC in their design, creation and implementation. It also highlighted the idea that this perspective is part of a broader rethinking process of the cultural field. Research limitations/implications – The research was carried out within a specific geographical area. The results, however, indicate the need for further research on the potential of IC in cultural ecosystems, in light of both a comparative and international perspective. Practical implications – The research highlights the emergence of new frameworks and highlights the role of IC in new governance models in the cultural sector. Social implications – The analysis underlines the need for new governance systems based on a bottom-up approach, multi-level and multi-stakeholder frameworks, and potentially bringing important societal changes. Originality/value – The concept of IC ecosystems remains a relatively unexplored field within the cultural sector. This paper could make a valuable contribution to the debate on new governance systems in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borin et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: