Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 21, 2006Pediatric RadiologyOpen Access

Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JSJ. Anthony SeibertUniversity of California, Davis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

J. Anthony Seibert (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ab76f5448f1e38b45fbb3https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0208-0
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium‐based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy2004 · 87 citations
  2. 2Fluoroscopic Image Brightening by Electronic Means1948 · 83 citations
  3. 3Performance of a 41×41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications2003 · 70 citations
  4. 4Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations2006 · 58 citations
  5. 5Indirect flat‐panel detector with avalanche gain: Fundamental feasibility investigation for SHARP‐AMFPI (scintillator HARP active matrix flat panel imager)2005 · 84 citations