Distant return electrode placement, insulated esophageal temperature probes, and high-power short-duration ablation significantly reduced peak esophageal temperature in a phantom gel model.
Does HPSD ablation, distant return electrode placement, and ETP insulation reduce peak esophageal temperature in a myocardial phantom gel model?
In a phantom gel model, high-power short-duration ablation, distant return electrode placement, and esophageal temperature probe insulation minimized esophageal heating, suggesting potential strategies to reduce thermal injury during radiofrequency ablation.
Absolute Event Rate: 39.23% vs 41.73%
p-value: p=<0.0001
ABSTRACT Introduction Atrio‐esophageal fistula is a rare but devastating complication from thermal esophageal injury during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Modifying ablation energy delivery and placement of esophageal temperature probes (ETPs) have been employed to mitigate the risk of thermal esophageal injury. Our study sought to compare the effects of return electrode location, insulation of the ETP, and use of high‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation on esophageal temperature, ETP temperature measurement, and thermal lesion dimensions. Methods A myocardial phantom gel model using thermochromic material was used to approximate the atrio‐esophageal environment. Irrigated ablations were performed at 30 W/20 s (low‐power long duration LPLD) and 50 W/5 s (HPSD) with variation of return electrode position and insulation of the ETP. Temperatures were continuously logged, and digital photography with in‐house software was performed to examine lesion dimensions. Results Distant placement of a return electrode compared to proximal placement decreased peak esophageal temperature ( T Peak ) across LPLD (41.73°C ± 0.12°C vs. 39.23°C ± 0.15°C; p < 0.0001) and HPSD ablations (39.17°C ± 0.06°C vs. 38.13°C ± 0.06°C; p < 0.0001). Insulation of the ETP reduced T Peak across LPLD (39.13°C ± 0.25°C vs. 41.73°C ± 0.12°C; p < 0.0001) and HPSD ablation (39.17°C ± 0.06°C vs. 38.27°C ± 0.06°C; p < 0.0001). HPSD ablation produced lower mean T Peak than LPLD regardless of the location of the return electrode location or insulation of the ETP. Conclusion HPSD settings, insulation of the ETP, and a distant return electrode placement minimized esophageal heating. These strategies may reduce thermal injury to the esophagus during radiofrequency ablation.
Abedin et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Thermal esophageal injury during pulmonary vein isolation. Distant return electrode placement, insulated ETP, and HPSD ablation vs. Proximal return electrode, uninsulated ETP, and LPLD ablation (30 W/20 s) was evaluated on Peak esophageal temperature (TPeak) with distant vs proximal return electrode during LPLD ablation (p=<0.0001). Distant return electrode placement, insulated esophageal temperature probes, and high-power short-duration ablation significantly reduced peak esophageal temperature in a phantom gel model.