Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article criticises the ontology of Margaret Archer's morphogenetic social theory, arguing that the concept of autonomous social structure on which she bases this social theory is contradictory. Against the ontological contradictions of Archer's work, the article tries to re-habilitate the interpretive tradition which Archer dismisses, showing that only this tradition provides a logically coherent and methodologically useful social ontology, which consists only of individuals and their social relations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony King (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: