Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine the molecular mechanisms of T cell stimulation by staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA), we examined the expression of T cell receptor (TcR) V beta on the T cells from four strains of mice stimulated in vitro with SEA, using flow cytometric analysis for the number of T cells bearing V beta 3, V beta 6, V beta 8, V beta 11 and RNA blotting analysis for the amount of transcripts of V beta 1, V beta 5 and V beta 12. The number of T cell blasts bearing V beta 1, V beta 3, V beta 1 or V beta 12 were increased in the T cell blasts proliferating in vitro in response to SEA in C57BL/6 mice. In AKR/J mice, which contain few V beta 11- or V beta 12-bearing T cells due to a tolerance to the self-MHC class II IE-antigens, T cells bearing V beta 1 or V beta 3 responded to SEA. SEA enriched only V beta 1-bearing T cells in BALB/c mice carrying Mls-2a which lack Mls-1a-reactive V beta 3-bearing T cells as well as V beta 11- and V beta 12-bearing T cells. In spite of the presence of V beta 1-bearing T cells, C3H/He T cells exhibited a very low responsiveness to SEA. T cell repertoires skewed by clonal deletion of self-reactive T cells may in part account for the different sensitivity to SEA among the different strains. A tolerance to SEA can be established in C57BL/6 mice which have been primed i.v. with SEA and treated i.p. with 200 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide 2 days later. All mature T cells bearing V beta 3 or V beta 11 were virtually abolished in the periphery of tolerant mice. These results suggest that most T cells reactive to SEA bear V beta 1, V beta 3, V beta 11 or V beta 12 and that clonal deletion of mature T cells reactive to SEA may account for the cellular mechanisms for cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance to SEA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takimoto et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: