Key result
The TIMI Risk Score successfully stratified risk in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, identifying a subgroup with normal CK-MB that derived significant benefit from tirofiban (RR 0.73, P=0.027).
Why the study?
Does tirofiban + heparin reduce death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischaemia compared to heparin alone in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes stratified by TIMI Risk Score?
Observational (n=1,915)
Does tirofiban + heparin reduce death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischaemia compared to heparin alone in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes stratified by TIMI Risk Score?
The TIMI Risk Score effectively stratifies risk in NSTE-ACS patients and identifies those with a score ≥4 who derive greater benefit from tirofiban therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support targeted tirofiban in higher-risk NSTE-ACS; extends TIMI score validation but leaves open prospective confirmation.
AIMS: We evaluated the TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina and Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction for predicting clinical outcomes and the efficacy of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Developed in TIMI 11B, the risk score is calculated as the sum of seven presenting characteristics (age > or =65 years, > or =3 cardiac risk factors, documented coronary disease, recent severe angina, ST deviation > or =0.5 mm, elevated cardiac markers, prior aspirin use). The risk score was validated in the PRISM-PLUS database (n=1915) and tested for interaction with the efficacy of tirofiban+heparin vs heparin alone. The risk score revealed an increasing gradient of risk for death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischaemia at 14 days ranging from 7.7-30.5% (P<0.001). Dichotomized at the median, patients with a score > or =4 derived a greater relative risk reduction with tirofiban (P((Interaction))=0.025). Among patients with normal creatine kinase myocardial bands, the risk score showed a 3.5-fold gradient of risk (P<0.001) and identified a population that derived significant benefit from tirofiban (RR 0.73, P=0.027). CONCLUSION: The TIMI Risk Score is a simple clinical tool for risk assessment that may aid in the early identification of patients who should be considered for treatment with potent antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David A. Morrow (2002) conducted an observational in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (n=1,915). tirofiban + heparin vs. heparin alone was evaluated on death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischaemia at 14 days (RR 0.73, p=0.027). The TIMI Risk Score successfully stratified risk in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, identifying a subgroup with normal CK-MB that derived significant benefit from tirofiban (RR 0.73, P=0.027).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: