The classical relativistic connexion between the energy pt of a free article and its momentum px, py, pz, namely, pt2 — px2 — py2 — pz2 — m2 = 0, (1) leads in the quantum theory to the wave equation {pt2 — px2 — py2 — pz2 — m2} ψ = 0, (2) where the p's are understood as the operators iħ ∂/∂t, — iħ ∂/∂x . . The general theory of the physical interpretation of quantum mechanics requires a wave equation of the form {pt — H} ψ = 0, (3) where H is a Hermitian operator not containing pt, and is called the Hamiltonian. The obvious equation of the form (3) which one gets from (2), namely, {pt — (px2 + py2 + pz2 + m2)½} ψ = 0, is unsatisfactory on account of the square root, which makes the application of Lorentz transformations very complicated. By allowing our particle to have a spin, we can get wave equations of the form (3) which are consistent with (2) and do not involve square roots. An example, applying to the case of a spin of half a quantum, namely, the equation {pt + αxpx + αypy + αzpz + αmm} ψ = 0, (4) where the four α's are anti-commuting matrices whose squares are unity, is well known, and has been found to give a satisfactory description of the electron and positron. The present paper will be concerned with other examples, applying to spins greater than a half. The elementary particles known to present-day physics, the electron, positron, neutron, and proton, each have a spin of a half, and thus the work of the present paper will have no immediate physical application. All the same, it is desirable to have the equation ready for a possible future discovery of an elementary particle with a spin greater than a half, or for approximate application to composite particles. Further, the underlying theory is of considerable mathematical interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. A. M. Dirac (1936) studied this question.