Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Infarct volume is used as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials of therapies for acute ischemic stroke. ABC/2 is a fast volumetric method, but its accuracy remains to be determined. We aimed to study the accuracy and reproducibility of ABC/2 in determining acute infarct volume with diffusion-weighted imaging. METHODS: We studied 86 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke. Three blinded observers determined volume with the ABC/2 method, and the results were compared with those of the manual planimetric method. RESULTS: The ABC/2 technique overestimated infarct volume by a median false increase (variable ABC/2 volume minus planimetric volume) of 7.33 cm(3) (1.29, 22.170, representing a 162.56% increase over the value of the gold standard (variable ABC/2 volume over planimetric volume) (121.70, 248.52). In each method, the interrater reliability was excellent: the intraclass correlations were .992 and .985 for the ABC/2 technique and planimetric method, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ABC/2 is volumetric method with clinical value but it consistently overestimates the real infarct volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedraza et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: