Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article considers language learner agency from a poststructuralist perspective, focusing on how agency is discursively constituted as individuals position themselves and are positioned as (potential) agents within ideologically defined spaces. As such, I regard agency as inherently unstable and as a discursively mobilized capacity to act. Drawing on a corpus of 18 interviews with adult immigrant small business owners in the United States, this study uses both quantitative and qualitative discourse analytic approaches in considering (a) recurrent linguistic constructs used across interviews to position interviewees as (in)agentive characters in the story worlds of their autobiographical accounts; (b) how these constructs are mobilized in the co‐constructed positioning work of interviewer and interviewees; and (c) so‐called common sense ideological discourses by which the interviewees are constituted as agents who rationally and responsibly make self‐generated choices and act on them. This multilayered positioning work constrained interviewees to speaking from positions of language learner or immigrant or small business owner , but at the same time such positioning mobilized recognizable subjectivities for them, enabling them to act in interpretable and meaningful ways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth R. Miller (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: