Key result
Subclinical rheumatic carditis was associated with higher mitral regurgitation resolution and higher survival free of rheumatic heart disease compared to mild rheumatic carditis (p=0.010).
Why the study?
Does the evolution of mitral and aortic regurgitation differ between children and adolescents with subclinical versus mild rheumatic carditis?
Cohort (n=125)
Does the evolution of mitral and aortic regurgitation differ between children and adolescents with subclinical versus mild rheumatic carditis?
Mitral regurgitation resolution is higher in patients with subclinical compared to mild rheumatic carditis, while aortic regurgitation involution is less frequent and similar in both groups.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support risk stratification in rheumatic carditis; leaves open whether screening alters progression or outcomes.
Background: Mild rheumatic carditis (MRC) and subclinical rheumatic carditis (SRC) are basically differentiated through auscultation of mitral regurgitation murmur. The evolution of these forms is not well established in the literature. Objective: To evaluate the evolution of mild and subclinical rheumatic carditis, considering mitral and aortic regurgitation (acute phase) and regression, maintenance or worsening of these diseases at the end of follow-up (chronic phase). Methods: Retrospective, longitudinal study, including patients with mild and subclinical rheumatic carditis. The echocardiographic evolution of mitral and aortic regurgitation was compared in both groups, considering the analysis at the end of follow-up. The Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used, with significance level established at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 125 patients were included, 69 (55.2%) with subclinical rheumatic carditis and 56 (44.8%) with mild rheumatic carditis, with a mean age in the acute phase of 10.4 ± 2.6 years and, at the end of study, 19.9 ± 4.6 years. The time of follow-up ranged from 2 to 23 years (mean: 9.38 ± 4.3 years). In the acute phase, mild/moderate or moderate mitral regurgitation was more frequent in patients with mild rheumatic carditis (p = 0.001). Mild or mild/moderate aortic regurgitation was also more common in the mild rheumatic carditis group (p = 0.045). In the chronic phase, we observed that both mitral (p < 0.0001) and aortic regurgitation (p = 0.009) were more frequent in patients with mild rheumatic carditis, and survival free of rheumatic heart disease was higher in the subclinical rheumatic carditis group (p = 0.010). Residual mitral regurgitation was higher in the mild rheumatic carditis group p < 0.0001), and residual aortic regurgitation was similar in both groups (p = 0.099). Conclusion: Mitral regurgitation resolution was higher in patients with subclinical rheumatic carditis, and the involution of aortic regurgitation was less frequent and similar in both groups. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2017;30(5):391-400)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Mild and subclinical rheumatic carditis (n=125). Subclinical rheumatic carditis vs. Mild rheumatic carditis was evaluated on Echocardiographic evolution of mitral and aortic regurgitation (regression, maintenance or worsening) (p=<0.0001). Subclinical rheumatic carditis was associated with higher mitral regurgitation resolution and higher survival free of rheumatic heart disease compared to mild rheumatic carditis (p=0.010).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: