Key result
Reporting CAC on lung cancer screening CTs is linked to ~53% higher lipid-lowering therapy prescription.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease mortality occurs at rates similar to lung cancer deaths in screening trials, prompting investigation into whether cardiovascular risk reduction could be improved using coronary artery calcium and risk assessment.
Does clinical reporting of coronary artery calcium on lung cancer screening CT improve the prescription of lipid lowering therapy in asymptomatic individuals without known coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,486)
No
Does clinical reporting of coronary artery calcium on lung cancer screening CT improve the prescription of lipid lowering therapy in asymptomatic individuals without known coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.22-1.92)
Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 45%
p-value: p=<0.001
Opportunistic reporting of coronary artery calcium on lung cancer screening CTs significantly increases the prescription of appropriate lipid-lowering therapy for cardiovascular risk reduction.
May support opportunistic CAC reporting to increase lipid-lowering prescriptions; leaves open effects on cardiovascular outcomes.
Background: In lung cancer screening trials, mortality from cardiovascular disease occurs at similar rates to lung cancer deaths. Survival following lung cancer screening could be optimized if atherosclerosis prevention was targeted. Thus, we sought to determine whether there was potential for improvement in rates of cardiovascular risk reduction therapy based upon coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular risk assessment. Methods: Clinical lung cancer screening-CT reports, lipid lowering therapy and clinical demographics were retrieved from the electronic medical record in the first consecutive 1486 cases without known coronary artery disease from the Ontario High Risk Lung Cancer Screening Pilot program. Lung cancer screening CT images were reviewed for presence and extent of coronary artery calcium. Results: Coronary artery calcium was detected in 83 % and was reported in 63 %. Lipid lowering was prescribed in 60 % of cases whose coronary artery calcium was reported versus 45 % of cases when coronary artery calcium was unreported (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, increased Framingham risk score (OR 2.31 95 % CI 1.73-2.31, p < 0.001) and reported coronary artery calcium (OR 1.53 95 % CI 1.22-1.92, p < 0.001) were associated with lipid lowering therapy. Additional cardiovascular risk lowering could be achieved in 21 % using coronary artery calcium and in 44 % with further consideration of clinical risk. Conclusions: In lung cancer screened patients, cardiovascular risk reduction could be optimized significantly by the opportunistic use of coronary artery calcium and clinical assessment. Appropriate cardiovascular risk reduction could attenuate the high prevalence of cardiovascular deaths in these individuals and improve overall survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mengesha et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic individuals undergoing lung cancer screening without known coronary artery disease (n=1,486). Clinical reporting of coronary artery calcium on CT vs. Unreported coronary artery calcium was evaluated on Prescription of lipid lowering therapy (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.92, p=<0.001). Clinical reporting of coronary artery calcium on lung cancer screening CTs significantly increased the likelihood of lipid-lowering therapy prescription (OR 1.53) compared to when it was unreported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: