Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are a cardinal symptom of schizophrenia, they are frequently described on a continuum, ranging from patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder to non-clinical populations. A key difference between these groups, however, is the absence of additional symptomatology as well as medication use in the group of non-clinical individuals, thus providing an excellent opportunity to study voices in relative isolation. However, this relies on the rather challenging assumption that AVH in clinical and non-clinical individuals can be considered the same phenomenon resulting from a common neurobiological substrate. Studies comparing voices between these groups might provide support for or against this assumption. Furthermore, increasing knowledge about AVH in non-clinical individuals might help eliminate ideas that AVH are always related to a need for care and could hence help to put voices in a more positive light. The aim of this review was therefore to review and summarize studies on AVH in non-clinical individuals with a main focus on the comparison between non-clinical individuals with AVH and individuals diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. Both groups displayed similar brain activation during the experience of AVH, showed aberrant brain connectivity and an increased rate of childhood traumas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daalman et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: