Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HIV-1 genotype assay using plasma viruses has been widely applied for detection of resistant viruses in infected individuals, whereas there are only a few reports about proviral genotype in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). To determine which sample, plasma or PBMC, should be used for early detection of drug-resistant viruses during antiretroviral treatment, we analyzed 275 plasma-derived and 211 PBMC-derived HIV-1 protease sequences obtained from HIV-1-infected patients during protease inhibitor (PI) therapy. In 70 of 107 pairs (65.4%) of plasma and PBMC samples taken from the same blood draws, the numbers of PI resistance-associated mutations in the plasma-derived genotype were different from those in the PBMC-derived genotype. Plasma viruses had more PI resistance-associated mutations than PBMC proviruses (P = 0.0004). Analysis of serial samples showed that plasma-derived genotype assay could detect primary mutations about 425 days earlier than PBMC-derived genotype when the plasma viral load was less than 10(4 )copies/mL. Our data suggest that genetic turnover of PBMC proviruses is slower than that of plasma viruses and that time lag between emergence of mutations in plasma-derived and PBMC-derived genotypes correlates inversely with viral load. Plasma viruses should be the material of choice for early detection of drug resistance during antiretroviral treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: