Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Peer review has been the principal way of evaluating scientific articles, ensuring that publications meet standards of methodology, integrity, and ethics. Occasionally, however, reviews are suboptimal, especially those by inexperienced reviewers. Therefore, this article offers suggestions on how to review a scientific article. Some of the most important suggestions include submitting the review in a timely fashion without undue delay, not breeching confidentiality, focusing mainly on the methodology, following specific format, and avoiding embarrassing comments to the authors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazarides et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: