Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Don Ihde introduced the concept of multistability: the “same” thing can be experienced in multiple ways. He argued that human–technics relations are multistable: the “same” person can relate to the “same” technic in different ways. However, Ihde does not explain in detail how he understands experience. I suggest that experience be defined as organism–environment intra-action. This definition has anthropological consequences, which I will explain. In this article, I will argue that technics influence human nature, at least potentially, in two ways. First, our character consists in our habits, and each habit is a skill, or active means. Second, habits incorporate both the traits of persons and of their environment, and instruments external to the body, or passive means, are a possible part of the environment. I will also explain multistability by deriving it from the practice-ladenness of experience. I will rely on classical pragmatism in my argumentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juho Lindholm (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: