Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical interviewing is viewed here as a social interactional pattern in order to examine the nature and limits of the technique as a means of scientific data acquisition. I defend the technique against criticisms that it is ecologically suspect and prone to systematic biases, mainly due to influence of the interviewer on the interviewee or to unnatural and biasing interactional patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea A. diSessa (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: